Why the study?
Do echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging parameters accurately predict elevated LVEDP in patients with an age-related normal transmitral Doppler profile?
Cross-Sectional (n=98)
Do echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging parameters accurately predict elevated LVEDP in patients with an age-related normal transmitral Doppler profile?
PVR-A and TDI-derived indices E/E' and MVG are reliable alternatives to the classical Valsalva maneuver for detecting a pseudonormal transmitral Doppler profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PVR-A may aid noninvasive LVEDP estimation in pseudonormal patterns; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of several echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) derived parameters to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of a pseudonormal mitral inflow pattern. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with age-related normal transmitral Doppler profile underwent echocardiography including TDI and measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) using fluid-filled catheters. Peak transmitral velocities were determined at rest (E, A) and during the strain phase of a Valsalva maneuver. The difference in duration between the pulmonary venous retrograde velocity and the transmitral A-velocity (PVR-A) was calculated from pulsed Doppler recordings. Propagation velocity of the early mitral inflow (VP) was determined by color M-mode. Early diastolic peak mitral annulus velocities (E') and the early diastolic transmyocardial velocity gradient of the posterior basal wall (MVG) were obtained by TDI. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients presented with normal diastolic function (group I: LVEDP9.5 +/- 3 mm Hg, E/A1.1 +/- 0.19), while pseudonormalization, defined as LVEDP 15 mm Hg and E/A > 0.9, was found in 46 patients (group II: LVEDP23 +/- 7 mm Hg, E/A1.43 +/- 0.83). The coefficient of linear correlation (r) and the area under ROC - curve (AUC) to predict LVEDP values 15 mm Hg were maximal for the index PVR-A (AUC = 0.92, r = 0.77), followed byE/E' (AUC = 0.80, r = 0.46), MVG (AUC = 0.65, r = 0.33) and E/VP (AUC = 0.69, r = 0.30), P < 0.01, whereas the decrease in E/A ratio during Valsalva maneuver failed to reach significance. Similar results were observed when echocardiographic parameters were used to estimate the left ventricular diastolic pressure before atrial contraction. CONCLUSIONS: PVR-A enabled the most accurate estimation of LVEDP. TDI-derived indices E/E' and MVG are also reliable alternatives superior to the classical Valsalva maneuver to detect a pseudonormal transmitral Doppler profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poerner et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Pseudonormal mitral inflow pattern (n=98). Echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging parameters (PVR-A, E/E', MVG) vs. Valsalva maneuver was evaluated on Prediction of LVEDP values ≥ 15 mm Hg (AUC 0.92, p=< 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: