Key result
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow reserve <1.6 identified significant LAD stenosis with 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity, compared to 100% and 29% for MPS.
Why the study?
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic CFR measurement improve the detection of significant LAD stenosis compared to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with LBBB?
Cross-Sectional (n=44)
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic CFR measurement improve the detection of significant LAD stenosis compared to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with LBBB?
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic CFR measurement provides superior specificity compared to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for detecting LAD stenosis in patients with LBBB.
BACKGROUND: Conventional noninvasive methods have well-known limitations for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, advancements in Doppler echocardiography permit transthoracic imaging of coronary flow velocities (CFV) and measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR). Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of transthoracic CFR measurements for detection of significant left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis in patients with LBBB and compare it to that of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). METHODS: Simultaneous transthoracic CFR measurements and MPS were analyzed in 44 consecutive patients with suspected CAD and permanent LBBB. Typical diastolic predominant phasic CFV Doppler spectra of distal LAD were obtained at rest and during a two-step (0.56-0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole infusion protocol. CFR was defined as the ratio of peak hyperemic velocities to the baseline values. A reversible perfusion defect at LAD territory was accepted as a positive scintigraphy finding for significant LAD stenosis. A coronary angiography was performed within 5 days of the CFR studies. RESULTS: The hyperemic diastolic peak velocity (44 +/- 9 cm/sec vs 62 +/- 2 cm/sec; P=0.01) and diastolic CFR (1.38 +/- 0.17 vs 1.93 +/- 0.3; P=0.001) were significantly lower in patients with LAD stenosis compared to those without LAD stenosis. The diastolic CFR values of <1.6 yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94% in the identification of significant LAD stenosis. In comparison, MPS detected LAD stenosis with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 29%. CONCLUSIONS: CFR measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is an accurate method that may improve noninvasive identification of LAD stenosis in patients with LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soylu et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease and permanent left bundle branch block (n=44). Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement vs. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was evaluated on Identification of significant LAD stenosis. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow reserve <1.6 identified significant LAD stenosis with 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity, compared to 100% and 29% for MPS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: