Key result
Interesterified spread fails to alter postprandial triacylglycerol levels compared to non-interesterified fats.
Why the study?
Does consumption of a commercially-available interesterified spread adversely affect postprandial lipemia, vascular function, or inflammatory responses compared to non-interesterified spread or butter in healthy adults?
RCT (n=50)
Double-blind
Treatment sequence was randomised using online software
No
Does consumption of a commercially-available interesterified spread adversely affect postprandial lipemia, vascular function, or inflammatory responses compared to non-interesterified spread or butter in healthy adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.44% vs 4.38%
p-value: p=0.831
A commercially available interesterified palm oil spread does not elicit worse postprandial lipemia, endothelial dysfunction, or inflammation compared with functionally equivalent non-interesterified spreads or spreadable butter in healthy adults.
Interesterified spreads show equivalent acute cardiometabolic responses in healthy adults; extends neutral RCT evidence on fat interesterification.
: In healthy adults, a commercially-available IE-based spread did not evoke a different postprandial triacylglycerol, lipoprotein subclass, oxidative stress, inflammatory or endotoxemic response to functionally-equivalent, but compositionally-distinct alternative spreads. Clinical trial registry number: NCT03438084 (https://ClinicalTrials.gov).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Healthy adults (n=50). Commercially-available interesterified (IE) palmitic acid-rich spread vs. Functionally-equivalent non-interesterified (non-IE) spread, spreadable butter, and rapeseed oil was evaluated on Postprandial serum triacylglycerol (TAG) incremental area under the curve (iAUC 0-8 h) (p=0.831). In healthy adults, a commercially-available interesterified spread did not significantly alter postprandial triacylglycerol concentrations (p=0.831) compared to non-interesterified alternatives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: