Key result
Endothelin receptor antagonists show promise as antihypertensives, particularly for resistant hypertension, and may offer additional cardiovascular and renal protection beyond blood pressure lowering.
Why the study?
Do endothelin receptor antagonists improve blood pressure and end-organ damage in patients with hypertension?
Do endothelin receptor antagonists improve blood pressure and end-organ damage in patients with hypertension?
Endothelin receptor antagonists represent a promising therapeutic class for resistant hypertension with potential pleiotropic benefits on cardiovascular and renal end-organs.
May support ERA consideration in resistant hypertension; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in larger trials.
The endothelin system is a pivotal player along the continuum of cardiovascular disease. There is convincing evidence that the system not only exerts a potent pressor effect but also promotes end-organ damage independent from blood pressure changes. The role of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) in the treatment of hypertension is rapidly evolving. Recent studies demonstrate a formidable antihypertensive effect. Utility of ERAs is likely to be greatest in patients with resistant hypertension. Beyond blood pressure lowering, ERAs exert several properties that may confer additional protection, including effects on endothelial function, atherosclerosis, arterial stiffening, renal function and proteinuria. The full potential of this class will only be realized when the results of ongoing and future studies in hypertension, heart failure and other forms of cardiovascular disease are completed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epstein et al. (2009) conducted a review in Hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) was evaluated. Endothelin receptor antagonists show promise as antihypertensives, particularly for resistant hypertension, and may offer additional cardiovascular and renal protection beyond blood pressure lowering.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: