Observational biomarker study analyzes tumor volume and ctHPV DNA, highlighting implications for prognosis in OPSCC.
Background: Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPV DNA) has shown clinical value in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), but its relationship with tumor burden and its role in prognosis, especially when combined with clinicoradiological factors, remain to be further defined. Methods: We analyzed 103 patients with HPV-positive OPSCC enrolled in an observational biomarker study, most of whom received induction chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy followed by definitive radiotherapy. Blood samples were collected at pretreatment, post-radiotherapy, and follow-up time points, and ctHPV DNA levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. Baseline clinicoradiological parameters from contrast-enhanced MR or CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were analyzed for their association with ctHPV DNA levels and clinical outcomes. Results: Baseline ctHPV DNA correlated with primary tumor volume (VT), nodal volume (VN), total tumor volume (VT+N), and the number of involved primary tumor sites and lymph node regions, particularly LN-related features. VT and maximum LN diameter were independent predictors of baseline ctHPV DNA. Detectable follow-up ctHPV DNA was associated with inferior progression-free survival but showed low sensitivity and positive predictive value for relapse detection. Integrative stratification using baseline ctHPV DNA and VT+N identified a potential high-risk subgroup with high tumor volume but paradoxically low ctHPV DNA (VOLhighDNAlow). Exploratory RNA-seq analysis was performed to investigate potential biological features underlying this discordance, and a seven-gene signature associated with PFS was identified. Conclusions: These findings suggest that baseline ctHPV DNA reflects tumor burden and may provide additional information for upfront risk stratification in HPV-positive OPSCC, warranting further validation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: