Randomized trial quantifies landscape ecological risk in urban regions, indicating assessment unit preferences.
Quantifying landscape ecological risk (LER) using multi-period land use data and ecological indicators is essential for understanding regional ecological dynamics. However, LER assessment is sensitive to spatial delineation, introducing uncertainty. This study developed an integrated LER model that incorporates the remote sensing ecological index and abundance index, and evaluated spatial unit effects through comparative analyses of fishnet, hexagonal, sub-watershed, and county units. LER dynamics in the Shandong Peninsula Urban Agglomeration (SPUA) from 2004 to 2024 were analyzed, and a boosted regression trees model was applied to quantify the relative importance of influencing factors and their nonlinear effects. The results indicate that: (1) sub-watershed units showed greater robustness and stability across multiple evaluation indicators, supporting their suitability for LER assessment; (2) LER in the SPUA exhibited a fluctuating but overall slightly increasing trend over the past two decades, with a persistent west-low and east-high spatial pattern; and (3) relief degree (29.13%) and nighttime light (17.78%) were the dominant factors shaping LER, showing an inverted U-shaped response and a saturating nonlinear increase, respectively. This study supports the use of sub-watershed units as an appropriate spatial unit for LER assessment and provides insights into terrain-sensitive conservation and sustainable land-use management in urbanizing regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: