Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines how historical commissions reveal limitations in transitional justice, indicating paths toward decolonization.
This article examines what state-sponsored historical commissions reveal about the temporal and epistemic limitations of transitional justice in addressing colonial legacies, and how they may open pathways toward a more decolonial approach. These commissions – though not inherently decolonial – can unsettle key assumptions of the transitional justice paradigm. In foregrounding history as site of intervention, they carry out a process of resignification that reinterprets dominant historical narratives, and trace structural continuities between colonial rule and present-day inequalities, thereby fostering recognition of colonial injustices. This article contributes to debates on decolonising transitional justice by centring its historiographical and epistemic dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cira Pallí-Asperó (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: