Examines economic viability of PV-BESS systems in households, suggesting key financial insights for homeowners.
Japan’s residential energy transition is shaped by imported-fuel exposure, post-feed-in tariff (FIT) value erosion, tariff uncertainty, and disaster risk. This study evaluates whether a fixed 4 kW photovoltaic (PV) and 5 kWh battery energy storage system (BESS) package can create sufficient private household value over a 25-year lifecycle. The analysis uses audited 30 min electricity-demand profiles from four detached households in Kyushu and a broader 181-household demand context. A perfect-foresight mixed-integer linear programming model provides an upper-bound dispatch benchmark. Dispatch outputs are evaluated using net present value (NPV), retail-price escalation, time-of-use tariff sensitivity, value of lost load (VoLL)-based outage valuation, forecast-realism adjustment, and a third-party ownership (TPO) benchmark. PV-only investment remains profitable, with a mean NPV of JPY 338,007, whereas adding BESS lowers mean household NPV to JPY −907,448. The implied break-even BESS capital cost is JPY 39,840/kWh, far below the JPY 200,000/kWh base assumption. A +50% retail-price escalation case improves mean PV-BESS NPV by JPY 788,381 but remains below break-even. During a 72 h outage, BESS serves 84.8% of assumed critical demand. The limiting factor is insufficient monetizable household value, not technical usefulness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: