Key result
Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using fractional flow reserve in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease provides better clinical outcomes than angiography-guided PCI.
Why the study?
Does physiology-guided PCI using FFR improve clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI or CABG in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease?
Does physiology-guided PCI using FFR improve clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI or CABG in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease?
Physiology-guided PCI using FFR improves risk stratification and clinical outcomes compared to angiography alone in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
FFR-guided PCI may improve MVD outcomes; supports physiology-based strategies but leaves open need for further prospective validation.
Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) frequently features ambiguous or intermediate lesions that may be both serial and complex, suggesting that multiple regions require revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with various challenges such as appropriate identification of lesions that should be treated, the choice of an optimum revascularization method, and limitations of long-term outcomes. Optimal patient selection and careful targeting of lesions are key when planning treatment. Physiology-guided decision-making (based on the fractional flow reserve) can overcome the current limitations of PCI used to treat MVD regardless of clinical presentation or disease subtype, as confirmed in recent clinical trials. Here, we review the use of physiology-guided PCI for patients with MVD, and their early and late outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2018) conducted a review in Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (FFR-guided PCI) vs. Angiography-guided PCI or CABG was evaluated. Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using fractional flow reserve in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease provides better clinical outcomes than angiography-guided PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: