Key result
An automated unsupervised multi-parametric segmentation method showed excellent agreement with manual segmentation for calculating intermuscular adipose tissue area in the thigh (R2 0.96).
Why the study?
Does an automated unsupervised multi-parametric segmentation method accurately determine SAT and IMAT areas compared to manual segmentation in calf and thigh MRI datasets?
Does an automated unsupervised multi-parametric segmentation method accurately determine SAT and IMAT areas compared to manual segmentation in calf and thigh MRI datasets?
Effect estimate: R2 0.96
The proposed automated multi-parametric segmentation approach provides an accurate and reliable method for calculating SAT and IMAT areas, significantly reducing postprocessing time.
Automated SAT/IMAT segmentation enables efficient body-composition analysis; leaves open prospective cardiometabolic validation.
PURPOSE: To introduce and validate an automated unsupervised multi-parametric method for segmentation of the subcutaneous fat and muscle regions to determine subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) areas based on data from a quantitative chemical shift-based water-fat separation approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unsupervised standard k-means clustering was used to define sets of similar features (k = 2) within the whole multi-modal image after the water-fat separation. The automated image processing chain was composed of three primary stages: tissue, muscle, and bone region segmentation. The algorithm was applied on calf and thigh datasets to compute SAT and IMAT areas and was compared with a manual segmentation. RESULTS: The IMAT area using the automatic segmentation had excellent agreement with the IMAT area using the manual segmentation for all the cases in the thigh (R(2): 0.96) and for cases with up to moderate IMAT area in the calf (R(2): 0.92). The group with the highest grade of muscle fat infiltration in the calf had the highest error in the inner SAT contour calculation. CONCLUSION: The proposed multi-parametric segmentation approach combined with quantitative water-fat imaging provides an accurate and reliable method for an automated calculation of the SAT and IMAT areas reducing considerably the total postprocessing time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valentinitsch et al. (2012) studied Adipose tissue depots in skeletal muscle. Automated unsupervised multi-parametric segmentation method vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on Agreement of intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) area calculation (R2 0.96). An automated unsupervised multi-parametric segmentation method showed excellent agreement with manual segmentation for calculating intermuscular adipose tissue area in the thigh (R2 0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: