Key result
An unsupervised MRI algorithm for muscle and fat quantification showed very good agreement with semimanual CT analysis and was more accurate than using nonsuppressed images alone.
Why the study?
Does an unsupervised MRI-based algorithm accurately quantify muscle and fat in the thigh compared to CT-based analysis?
Does an unsupervised MRI-based algorithm accurately quantify muscle and fat in the thigh compared to CT-based analysis?
An automated MRI-based algorithm provides accurate, reproducible quantification of thigh muscle and fat compared to manual CT analysis.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: To introduce and validate an unsupervised muscle and fat quantification algorithm based on joint analysis of water-suppressed (WS), fat-suppressed (FS), and water and fat (nonsuppressed) volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the mid-thigh region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We first segmented the subcutaneous fat by use of a parametric deformable model, then applied centroid clustering in the feature domain defined by the voxel intensities in WS and FS images to identify the intermuscular fat and muscle. In the final step we computed volumetric and area measures of fat and muscle. We applied this algorithm on datasets of water-, fat-, and nonsuppressed volumetric MR images acquired from 28 participants. RESULTS: We validated our tissue composition analysis against fat and muscle area measurements obtained from semimanual analysis of single-slice mid-thigh computed tomography (CT) images of the same participants and found very good agreement between the two methods. Furthermore, we compared the proposed approach with a variant that uses nonsuppressed images only and observed that joint analysis of WS and FS images is more accurate than the nonsuppressed only variant. CONCLUSION: Our MRI algorithm produces accurate tissue quantification, is less labor-intensive, and more reproducible than the original CT-based workflow and can address interparticipant anatomic variability and intensity inhomogeneity effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support radiation-free thigh analysis in research; leaves clinical adoption open pending larger validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makrogiannis et al. (2011) studied this question. Unsupervised muscle and fat quantification algorithm based on joint analysis of WS and FS MRI vs. Semimanual analysis of single-slice mid-thigh CT images was evaluated on Fat and muscle area measurements. An unsupervised MRI algorithm for muscle and fat quantification showed very good agreement with semimanual CT analysis and was more accurate than using nonsuppressed images alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: