Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates autonomous driving efficiency and safety, suggesting superior outcomes with adaptive signals.
In order to improve the efficiency and safety of autonomous driving in complex traffic environments, this study proposes a hierarchical control framework based on Adaptive Reward Signal (AR-E-DQN) and Adaptive Responsibility Sensitive Safety Model (ARSS). The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms traditional methods under different traffic densities. In low-density scenes, the average speed of AR-E-DQN is 28.52 m/s, the average reward is 48.63, and the collision rate is only 1.2%, significantly better than DQN's 25.86 m/s, 37.63, and 5.2%. In high-density scenes (ρ = 2), adaptive rewards can still maintain a speed of 24.76 m/s and a low collision rate of 5.3%, while traditional fixed rewards can reduce the speed to 20.32 m/s and increase the collision rate to 12.8%. Similarly, ARSS significantly outperforms traditional RSS in terms of safety control, reducing collision rates by over 50% at high densities. Research has shown that this method achieves a better balance between efficiency and safety, and has strong practicality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kai He (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: