This analysis examines how buy-online-and-return-in-store strategies affect profits for retailers in competitive and monopolistic markets.
Motivated by the Amazon returns at Kohl's programme, the article analyzes under what conditions buy-online-and-return-in-store (BORS) improves the profit of an e-tailer and a store when they offer substitute products. Firstly, BORS enhances the e-tailer's profit if the unit BORS handling cost is below a threshold, and continues to do so even when the cost exceeds another threshold under a duopoly with multichannel returns. BORS boosts the store's profit if the unit BORS handling cost exceeds a threshold. Secondly, when BORS leads to a monopoly market, BORS is a win-in strategy if the unit BORS handling cost is below a threshold. But when competition still exists with BORS, the unit BORS handling cost should exceed a threshold. Finally, without BORS, a higher consumers' hassle cost of returning online benefits the store but hurts the e-tailer, while with BORS, it benefits both retailers or exerts no impacts under certain conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: