Why the study?
Higher BMI is associated with better outcomes after TAVR, but whether this obesity paradox varies by age remains unclear.
Does age modify the association between BMI and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=6,639)
Yes
Does age modify the association between BMI and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“In clinical terms, higher BMI should not be viewed as uniformly protective; rather, lower BMI in elderly TAVR patients may identify a more vulnerable phenotype with reduced physiologic reserve.”
The 'obesity paradox' in TAVR is age-dependent, with higher BMI conferring a survival advantage only in older adults (≥65 years), suggesting that lower BMI in this population reflects a higher-risk frailty phenotype.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=6,639). Body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2 vs. BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality in patients ≥65 years of age (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.57, p=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: