Key result
Underweight status linked to ~3-fold higher in-hospital mortality after TAVR vs. ideal BMI.
Why the study?
The association between body mass index and outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not well understood.
Does extreme body mass index worsen in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing elective SAVR or TAVR?
Cohort (n=103,000)
Yes
Does extreme body mass index worsen in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing elective SAVR or TAVR?
Odds Ratio: 2.99 (95% CI 1.16–7.74)
Underweight status significantly increases in-hospital mortality and complications following both TAVR and SAVR, highlighting a vulnerable cohort requiring focused nutritional and surgical optimization.
Underweight TAVR patients warrant heightened risk awareness; this single observational cohort leaves open whether nutritional optimization improves outcomes.
Background: The association between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well understood. This study assessed the nuanced relationship between BMI and clinical outcomes in a nationally representative cohort undergoing aortic valve replacement. Methods: Adult (≥18 years) admissions for elective SAVR or TAVR from the 2016-2021 National Inpatient Sample were analyzed. BMI was categorized as underweight (<20), ideal weight (20-30), obesity class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (≥40). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse events (MAE), a composite of mortality and complications (e.g., stroke, thromboembolic, cardiac, respiratory, infection, renal). Results: Among 103,000 patients, 61.2 % underwent TAVR. TAVR patients were older (76 vs. 64 years; p < 0.001) and more frequently underweight (3.1 % vs. 1.5 %; p < 0.001) compared to SAVR patients. In TAVR, BMI < 20 was associated with higher mortality (AOR 2.99, 95 % CI 1.16-7.74) and MAE (AOR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.30-2.34) compared to ideal BMI. Obesity did not increase the overall incidence of MAE in patients undergoing TAVR. In SAVR, mortality was not associated with BMI, but underweight (AOR 2.05, 95 % CI 1.33-3.15) and class III obesity (AOR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.09-1.65) were linked to higher MAE risk. Conclusions: Extremes of BMI results in poorer outcomes in SAVR and TAVR. Underweight patients had increased risks across both approaches, while severe obesity elevated MAE risk in SAVR. These findings underscore the need for tailored perioperative strategies and risk counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Elective surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (n=103,000). Underweight (BMI <20) vs. Ideal weight (BMI 20-30) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (AOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.16-7.74). Underweight status (BMI <20) was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (AOR 2.99) and major adverse events in TAVR compared to patients with ideal BMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: