Key result
Review characterizes calcific aortic valve disease as an active, regulated process rather than passive aging.
Why the study?
Calcific aortic valve disease was traditionally considered a passive degenerative process, but is an actively regulated disease requiring a consensus statement on translational research and future research directions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“In 2011, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on CAVD determined that the biology of calcification can no longer be deemed a degenerative process, but rather an active cellular osteogenic process.”
“We are starting to appreciate that CAVS is not simply a passive degenerative process associated with aging but that it involves active mechanisms that may be amenable to intervention.”
This consensus statement highlights that calcific aortic valve disease is an active, regulated process and outlines future translational research directions for diagnosis and treatment.
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) encompasses the range of disease from initial alterations in the cell biology of the leaflets to end-stage calcification resulting in left ventricular outflow obstruction. The first detectable macroscopic changes in the leaflets, seen as calcification, or focal leaflet thickening with normal valve function, is termed aortic valve sclerosis, but it is likely that the initiating events in the disease process occur much earlier. Disease progression is characterized by a process of thickening of the valve leaflets and the formation of calcium nodules – often including the formation of actual bone – and new blood vessels, which are concentrated near the aortic surface. End stage disease, e.g. calcific aortic stenosis, is characterized pathologically by large nodular calcific masses within the aortic cusps that protrude through the outflow surfaces into the sinuses of Valsalva, interfering with opening of the cusps. For decades, this disease was thought to be a passive process in which the valve degenerates with age in association with calcium accumulation. Moreover, although calcific aortic valve disease is more common with age, it is not an inevitable consequence of aging. Instead, CAVD appears to be an actively regulated disease process that cannot be characterized exclusively as “senile” or “degenerative.” The NHLBI convened a group of scientists from different fields of study, including cardiac imaging, molecular biology, cardiovascular pathology, epidemiology, cell biology, endocrinology, bioengineering, and clinical outcomes, to review the scientific studies from the past decade in the field of CAVD. The purpose was to develop a consensus statement on the current state of translational research related to CAVD. Herein, we summarize recent scientific studies and define future directions for research to diagnose, treat and potentially prevent this complex disease process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajamannan et al. (2011) conducted a review in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Calcific aortic valve disease is an actively regulated disease process rather than a passive degenerative consequence of aging.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: