This article reconceptualizes Global Citizenship Education through an ethical lens, suggesting new pedagogical frameworks for educators.
This article reconceptualizes Global Citizenship Education (GCE) as a humane lacuna, a porous, searching interval where competing claims to justice press against one another. In this rendering, GCE becomes an ethical orientation toward uncertainty. An openness, a willingness to dwell with the fragile, the plural, the not-yet-coherent. Through the SCALE heuristic—skepticism, connection, allosyncrasy, liminality, and expression—the article offers both an analytic framework and a pedagogical grammar that orients practice within such a space. Empirically grounded in constructivist analyses of teacher–student dialogue, it demonstrates how ethical understanding emerges reflexively and dialogically. In a theoretical sense, Stewart Brand’s Pace Layers elucidate the layered temporalities shaping moral formation. These lenses foreground relationality, temporality, and endurance, challenging technocratic and universalist models. The humane lacuna therefore re-situates normativity within lived encounter and layered time, offering educators an alternative means of grappling with global complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas Palmer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: