Randomized trial assesses the structural relationships among sustainability factors in HoReCa and MRO sectors, suggesting future policy integration.
Sustainable development views energy as a determinant of the interdependence between economic growth and ecosystem protection, which influences the specificity of energy-production relationships in the hospitality and catering sectors (HoReCa) and the Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) sector. The primary goal of this study is to identify and assess the structural relationships between environmental, fiscal, production, and energy factors in industrial enterprises and their impact on production and resource potential within the intersectoral network of the HoReCa and MRO sectors, taking into account emission burdens and fiscal instruments. The research procedure utilized partial least squares coherent structural equation modeling (PLSc-SEM). The model was built using Eurostat data from 2008 to 2020 for companies in 23 countries of the European Union. The analysis showed that the energy consumption of the hospitality and catering establishments (HoReCa) is the strongest predictor of MRO sector activity (β = 0.910), whereas the emission intensity of MROs exerts a comparatively minor effect. The results document the dominance of scale over emission intensity in shaping environmental burdens. Furthermore, they confirm the negative impact of environmental taxes on the remuneration fund of highly qualified specialists. The full mediation of operational scale was also demonstrated in the relationships between energy demand, emissions levels, and labor costs. The results of the study clearly indicate the need to integrate building energy policy with the decarbonization of technical services. From a macroeconomic perspective, this approach supports the achievement of sustainable development goals. Implementing predictive maintenance demonstrates a dual synergistic effect, combining maximized resource productivity with a simultaneous reduction in carbon footprint.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sztorc et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: