Case study demonstrates improved metacognitive outcomes with interactive learning dashboards in a university setting, highlighting engagement benefits.
Learning Analytics Dashboards (LADs) have shown limited impact on student outcomes, often functioning as static visualizations. In this paper, we present a case study reimagining LADs as interactive tools that promote student engagement. Namely, we extend a conventional LAD with a Large Language Model (LLM)-powered pedagogical agent and an interactive Judgement of Learning (JoL) feature to support students’ awareness of their study progress. The pedagogical agent engaged students in conversations about their learning data, while the JoL feature required self-assessment before viewing system metrics, encouraging learners’ calibration of their judgement. This interactive LAD (ILAD) was implemented in a university programming course with three randomly assigned conditions: no agent, a “telling” agent providing information about learner data, and an “eliciting” agent asking questions about learner data. The case study reports on the data collected over five weeks from thirty students paid to regularly use the ILAD within their computer science course. Data analysis from this small sample showed that the students in the “elicit” condition engaged in more reflection and more accurately judged their own mastery. This study highlights ILADs’ potential to foster student engagement with learning data and improve metacognitive outcomes, offering new directions for learning dashboard design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: