Key result
TEG K shows only modest accuracy for predicting anti-FXa levels during pregnancy.
Why the study?
Regional anaesthesia during ongoing LMWH thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of haematoma, prompting evaluation of the anticoagulant effect of LMWH during pregnancy via thrombelastography and anti-factor Xa activity.
Does thrombelastography correlate with anti-factor Xa activity for measuring the anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women at high risk of VTE?
Cohort (n=16)
No
Does thrombelastography correlate with anti-factor Xa activity for measuring the anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women at high risk of VTE?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thrombelastography shows only modest correlation with anti-factor Xa activity for monitoring LMWH in pregnant women, suggesting it cannot currently replace anti-FXa testing for assessing bleeding risk prior to regional anesthesia.
Venous thromboembolism is a common cause of maternal mortality. Many women need regional anaesthesia during vaginal delivery or caesarean section. However, the risk of epidural or spinal haematoma is increased if regional anaesthesia is administered during ongoing thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aims of this pilot study are to evaluate the anticoagulant effect of LMWH during pregnancy by thrombelastography and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity and their correlations. Sixteen pregnant women were administered dalteparin or tinzaparin from early pregnancy until six weeks postpartum. The anticoagulant effect was determined immediately before and three hours after injection. The target anti-FXa activity was 0.1-0.2 IU/ml pre-injection and less than 0.45 IU/ml post-injection. Thrombelastography variables were assessed at the same time. The correlations between anti-FXa activity and thrombelastography variables were modest, with correlation coefficients at 0.4-0.5. The thrombelastography variable best correlated to anti-FXa activity <0.1 IU/ml was thrombelastography K. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for thrombelastography K against anti-FXa activity <0.1 IU/ml was 0.77 (95% confidence intervals 0.64 to 0.91) with sensitivity 0.76 and specificity 0.81. The correlations increased as pregnancy progressed. The anticoagulant effect of LMWH can be measured either by analysis of anti-FXa activity or with thrombelastography. However, the correlation between the two methods is too low to allow replacement of one by the other. Further studies are necessary to determine which of the methods best predicts anticoagulant effect and increased risk of bleeding complications related to delivery or regional anaesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlberg et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pregnant women at very high risk of venous thromboembolism (n=16). Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin or tinzaparin) was evaluated on Prediction of anti-FXa activity <0.1 IU/ml using TEG-K (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.91). Thrombelastography K showed only modest accuracy in predicting anti-factor Xa activity <0.1 IU/ml (AUC 0.77), indicating the two methods cannot be used interchangeably to measure the anticoagulant effect of LMWH during pregnancy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: