Key result
Baseline frailty is linked to ~75% higher MACE risk in coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Frailty is common among patients with CHD, but the relationship between baseline frailty, its longitudinal changes, and the risk of MACEs needed evaluation.
Does frailty and its longitudinal progression increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=1,793)
Yes
Does frailty and its longitudinal progression increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease?
Frailty is a dynamic risk factor in patients with coronary heart disease, and its progression significantly increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND: Frailty is common among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to examine both baseline frailty and its longitudinal changes in relation to the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with CHD. METHODS: Data were sourced from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study. Frailty status was assessed using a modified Fried frailty phenotype at 2 consecutive surveys. The outcome was MACEs, defined as a composite of recurrent CHD, incident heart failure, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: In baseline frailty analyses, 1793 patients with CHD were included. Compared with robust patients, prefrail and frail patients had a higher risk of MACEs (HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.08-1.42] for prefrail; and HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.43-2.15] for frail). In frailty transition analyses, 862 patients with CHD were included. Patients who progressed from robust to prefrail/frail status had a higher MACE risk (HR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.07-1.91]) compared with those who remained robust. Similarly, progression from prefrail to frail status was associated with an increased risk of MACEs (HR, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.62-3.27]) compared with stable prefrailty. Conversely, recovery from prefrail to robust status was related to a decreased MACE risk (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.40-0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: Both baseline frailty and its temporal changes were associated with the risk of MACEs among patients with CHD, highlighting the clinical value of monitoring and intervening for frailty in CHD management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=1,793). Frailty vs. Robust status was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of recurrent CHD, incident heart failure, stroke, or cardiovascular death) (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.43-2.15, p=<0.001). Baseline frailty was associated with a 75% increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to robust status in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: