Key result
Machine learning-derived frailty index predicts ~94% higher risk of cardiac death post-PCI.
Why the study?
Existing operationalized frailty measurement tools are limited and resource intensive, though frailty is associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing PCI.
Does a machine learning-derived frailty index predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=1,732)
No
Does a machine learning-derived frailty index predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Odds Ratio: 1.94 (95% CI 1.79–2.1)
p-value: p=< 0.001
A machine learning-derived frailty index using XGBoost demonstrates strong predictive power for cardiac and in-hospital mortality following PCI, outperforming traditional logistic regression.
ML frailty index may aid post-PCI risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Introduction: Frailty is associated with increased mortality in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Existing operationalized frailty measurement tools are limited and require resource intensive process. We developed and validated a tool to identify and stratify frailty using collected data for patients who underwent PCI and explored its predictive power to predict adverse clinical outcomes post PCI. Methods: Between 2014 and 2015, 1,732 patients who underwent semi-urgent or elective PCI in a tertiary centre were included. Variables including demographics, co-morbidities, investigations and clinical outcomes to 33 ± 37 months were analysed. Logistic regression model and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model were constructed to identify predictors of adverse clinical outcomes post PCI. The final models' predicted probabilities were assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: With model analysis, frailty index (FI), age and gender were the 3 most important features for adverse clinical outcomes prediction, with FI contributing the most. After adjustment, the odds of FI to predict cardiac death and in-hospital death post PCI remained significant [1.94 (95 %CI1.79-2.10); p < 0.001, 2.04(95 %CI 1.87-2.23); p < 0.001 respectively]. The XGBoost machine learning models improved predictive power for cardiac death [AUC 0.83(95 %CI 0.80-0.86)] and in hospital death [AUC 0.83(95 %CI 0.80-0.86)] post PCI compared to logistic regression models. Conclusion: The resultant model developed using novel machine learning methodologies had good predictive power for significant clinical outcomes post PCI with potential to be automated within hospital information systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soong et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=1,732). Frailty index was evaluated on Cardiac death post PCI (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.79-2.10, p=< 0.001). A machine learning-derived frailty index significantly predicted cardiac death post-PCI (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.79-2.10; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: