Version 5.1 demonstrates finite quark source construction and CKM access in quark families, suggesting novel methods for mass calculation.
Version 5.1 retains the finite, executable source-word construction for the six quark family, its color-singlet baryon readout, and the CKM source/access packet. The central question is whether the printed quark rows can be generated from a declared typed grammar rather than selected after the observed masses or mixing entries are known. The release adds an explicit qualitative axiom and concept load map. The weights are structural reach, not experimental significance and not an additive score: A1 is 4/5, A2 is 3/5, A3 is 0/5 because it is not active in this paper's constructor set, A4, A5-X, A6, and A7 are 5/5, and A7U is 1/5 as a completion guardrail. Artian Geometry, Access Law, MARIAM depth grammar, typed finite-set cardinality, Keystone class discipline, and the no-retune firewall are mapped to the concrete quark, baryon, CKM, and audit rows they govern. The compact source-side load relation is \[ { A1+A4+A5-X+A6+A7 \{finite quark source, real J-holonomy, closed color/family bundle, declared access row\}. } \] The source input is a typed quark label \[ f(S_f,r_f,Y_R(f),Q_f, S_f), \] with sector, generation shell, right hypercharge, electric charge, and mass scheme declared before the mass calculation. The MARIAM depth compiler is \[ { _f=4(r_f+h_f)+ε_f r_f+β_f {r_f2}, β_f={ sred}_4\!(3Y_R(f)/2), } \] and the source mass word is read through \[ m_fS=E_H e-_f{ T}_f R_fS. \] The observed quark masses are downstream audit rows, not constructor inputs. The finite compiler has sixteen declared local metadata words for each typed quark. Representation gates fix one local word per slot, so the six-slot class obeys \[ { | W_Q|=16^6=16\,777\,216, # W_Qˡᵉᵍᵃˡ=1. } \] The resulting depths are \[ (_t,_b,_c,_s,_d,_u)=(0,4,5,8,11,12). \] This is a finite uniqueness statement inside the book-declared MARIAM grammar, not a probability or a look-elsewhere significance. The same source packet passes through the unique color determinant and finite spin-flavor endurance readout. The proton row is \[ { M_pppm,QTT=938.272093881\,{ MeV}, |M_p-m_p|/m_p=0.00474\,{ ppm}. } \] The paper also prints the formal comparison residual, approximately \(+15.35σ\), against the sub-eV CODATA metrology row. The ppm source/readout result is therefore not advertised as sub-eV precision agreement, and source-only SI closure is not claimed. The CKM precision packet is derived from typed finite-set cardinalities rather than from a search around the observed answer. Its count tuple is \[ { (n₁₂,u₁₂,n₂₃,a₁₃,p_δ,q_δ,n_L) =(20,10,104,6,7,12,192). } \] The corresponding precision bridge is \[ s₁₂ᵖʳᵉᶜ=√2sin\!π/20(1+1/10ρ), s₂₃ᵖʳᵉᶜ=√2sin\!π/104, \] \[ s₁₃ᵖʳᵉᶜ=38(1+1/6ρ)s₁₂ᵖʳᵉᶜs₂₃ᵖʳᵉᶜ, δprec=π/3+7/12ρ. \] The frozen left-access profile has maximum published marginal pulls of \(0.30σ\), \(0.96σ\), and \(0.46σ\) against the PDG 2025, CKMfitter Summer 2025, and UTfit Summer 2025 profile rows, respectively. The release keeps a strict statistical boundary: public marginal intervals do not determine a joint CKM covariance, so no joint \(χ^2\) is fabricated. A future fit-group likelihood can be added as a new external audit row. Scoped status Σ-QUARK-SIX-MASS-SOURCE-WORD-COMPILER-CLOSED Σ-QUARK-MARIAM-METADATA-UNIQUENESS-16^6-TO-1-CLOSED Σ-QUARK-COLOR-SINGLET-BARYON-SOURCE-UNLOCK-CLOSED Σ-QUARK-PROTON-PPM-READOUT-CLOSED Σ-CKM-TYPED-CARDINALITY-PACKET-CLOSED Σ-CKM-PUBLIC-MARGINAL-PROFILE-CLOSED Σ-CKM-JOINT-COVARIANCE-FROM-MARGINALS-NONIDENTIFIABLE Σ-QUARK-SOURCE-ONLY-SI-CLOSURE-NOT-CLAIMED Related anchors Main book v10.01: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 QTT DOI Map: quantumtraction.org/doi-map Charged-lepton family-rank reference theorem: 10.5281/zenodo.20698191 Neutrino family-rank reference theorem: 10.5281/zenodo.20571452 PMNS mixing reference framework: 10.5281/zenodo.20735493 The stable paper-family identifier is the concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20722978. Files Version 5.1 PDF paper, uploaded first as the default preview Version 5.1 reconstruction package ZIP containing the LaTeX source, machine certificates, numerical audit outputs, render audit, README, release notes, and SHA-256 manifest
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attar Ali (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: