Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adjunctive mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are widely deployed in psychiatric care, yet comparative efficacy is obscured by heterogeneity in control stringency, endpoints, and follow-up. PRISMA-conformant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (N = 1,659), pooled separately by effect metric: binary relapse (RR; k = 3), time-to-event relapse (HR; k = 2 independent trial-level estimates), and continuous outcomes (Hedges’ g; k = 5). MBIs favored relapse prevention (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.39–1.02; HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.98) and suggested a small-to-moderate reduction in symptom severity (g = −0.27, 95% CI −0.55 to 0.02), with substantial heterogeneity for continuous outcomes (I2 = 62.8%). Effects were directionally consistent, strongest for time-to-event relapse, but small-k uncertainty limits precision. This review advances prior syntheses by metric-stratified pooling and by linking estimates to mechanistically informed practice components to improve clinical interpretability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Lomas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: