Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher education is undergoing a transition in which static multimodal resources are giving way to immersive learning environments powered by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). This PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review, prospectively registered in INPLASY (202610066), synthesizes evidence on immersive GenAI-based strategies in higher education, examining their reported contributions to sustainability, inclusion, and learning outcomes. Searches across Scopus, ScienceDirect, and ERIC (2022–2026) identified 1364 records; after quality appraisal using an adapted CASP instrument, 25 studies were included in a narrative and descriptive synthesis. Five strategy types emerged—VR-based simulations, virtual patient platforms, adaptive LLM tutoring systems, mixed/augmented reality environments, and 3D/metaverse configurations—with GPT-family models predominating (56%). The central finding is a structural reporting asymmetry: learning outcomes were explicitly documented in 23 studies (92%), whereas sustainability and inclusion were explicitly reported as outcome domains in only one study each (4%). Health sciences (36%) and educational technology (28%) dominated the evidence base, while Latin American, African, and most STEM contexts remained underrepresented. Immersive GenAI strategies are being evaluated for short-term instructional value, while their contribution to sustainable higher education remains underexamined. Advancing SDG 4 requires longitudinal designs, equity-oriented frameworks, and indicators capable of evaluating inclusion and durable learning gains across institutional contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: