Key result
Telehealth interventions for cardio-oncology rehabilitation are feasible and may provide physiological and psychological benefits as an alternative to standard care for cancer survivors.
Why the study?
Cardio-oncology rehabilitation mitigates cardiovascular risk in cancer patients and survivors, but low utilization and pandemic restrictions limit traditional programs, necessitating telehealth alternatives.
Design
Literature review
Authors
Loading...
Cardio-oncology rehabilitation may mitigate rising CV risks in cancer survivors; leaves open the need for prospective trials before practice change.
Telehealth and mobile applications offer a feasible alternative to traditional cardio-oncology rehabilitation, potentially overcoming utilization barriers for cancer survivors.
Baťalík et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cancer survivors at risk for cardiovascular disease. Telehealth Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CORE) vs. Standard care was evaluated. Telehealth interventions for cardio-oncology rehabilitation are feasible and may provide physiological and psychological benefits as an alternative to standard care for cancer survivors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: