Randomized trial assesses HIV prevention needs in gender diverse individuals, highlighting service gaps.
Background The HIV-related needs of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people who have sex with men in Australia are under-researched, impeding the effective use and targeting of HIV and sexual health services. Methods We used behavioural surveillance data to compare transgender men, non-binary people, and cisgender men on a range of factors, including demographics, sexual health, and the use of HIV testing and prevention. All eligible participant responses from the Gay Community Periodic Surveys (repeated, community-based, cross-sectional surveys) in 2019–2023 were included. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used to compare the groups. Results The survey included 41,883 survey responses (2.3% from transgender men and 2.7% from non-binary people). Compared with cisgender men, transgender men and non-binary people were younger, more likely to identify as bisexual or queer (than gay), and less likely to have a university degree or to be employed full-time. Transgender men were more likely to have never tested for HIV (31.8% vs 9.0%) and to not be using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP; 74.2% vs 56.6%) compared to cisgender men. Non-binary people were more likely than cisgender men to have never tested for HIV (19.9% vs 9.0%), as likely as cisgender men to have tested in the past year (60.0% vs 63.9%), and similarly likely to be on PrEP (23.9% vs 30.8%). Conclusions Encouraging HIV testing and PrEP uptake among transgender men and non-binary people could help improve HIV prevention coverage in these population groups. Free or low-cost services that are gender inclusive may be particularly important for gender diverse people on lower incomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bandlora et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: