Background: We assessed access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and interest in integration of PrEP with gender-affirmative care in a global sample of transmasculine persons. Methods: Transmasculine persons (N = 590) aged 18 years and above from 57 countries completed a brief online survey from April to July 2022 about sexual behavior, knowledge, and interest in PrEP, current access to PrEP and gender-affirmative care, and preferred context for accessing PrEP. Descriptive analyses were stratified by country income group. Results: Most participants (54.4%) lived near a health center offering care to trans people. Overall, 1.9% of respondents reported ever receiving a positive HIV test result. Among those who had not (n = 579), more than a third reported engaging in receptive sex in the past year (35.2%) or anticipated doing so in the next year (41.5%), 86.9% had never received information about HIV prevention specific to transmasculine people, and 76.3% had heard of PrEP. Among those who had heard of PrEP (n = 440), only 18.9% had discussed or been offered it by a provider, and only 3.6% were currently taking it—yet 67.9% who had heard of it but were not using it would “definitely” (28.5%) or “maybe” (39.4%) be interested in taking it were it available for free. Out of these participants, the majority (60.5%) preferred the idea of accessing PrEP from the same clinic where they received gender-affirming care. Conclusions: Interventions are needed to improve PrEP access for transmasculine people globally. Clinics already providing gender-affirming care to trans people are acceptable clinical contexts to integrate such interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paine et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: