Why the study?
The effect of surgical timing on hospital length of stay after hip fracture surgery remains debated, particularly in the Middle Eastern region.
Does early surgery (<48 hours) reduce hospital length of stay in elderly patients with hip fractures?
Cohort (n=179)
No
Does early surgery (<48 hours) reduce hospital length of stay in elderly patients with hip fractures?
Early surgical intervention (within 48 hours) for hip fractures in elderly patients significantly reduces hospital length of stay and ICU admission rates, optimizing healthcare resource utilization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform expedited pathways in elderly hip fracture care; leaves open causal confirmation and generalizability in randomized trials.
Background: Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and healthcare utilization among elderly patients. Early surgical intervention has been associated with improved postoperative outcomes; however, the effect of surgical timing on hospital length of stay (LOS) remains debated, especially in the Middle Eastern region. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical timing on LOS and postoperative outcomes among elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent surgical management for proximal femur fractures between May 2019 and May 2025 were included. Surgical timing was categorized as early (<48 h from admission) or delayed (≥48 h). The primary outcome was hospital LOS. Secondary outcomes included ICU admission, venous thromboembolism (VTE), respiratory infection, periprosthetic infection, and one-year mortality. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to assess time to hospital discharge. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 179 patients were included, of whom 100 (55.9%) underwent early surgery, and 79 (44.1%) underwent delayed surgery. The median LOS was significantly shorter in the early surgery group compared with the delayed surgery group (7 days [95% CI: 6–7] vs. 11.5 days [95% CI: 9–14]; log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities, surgical factors, and pre-hospital delay, early surgery remained independently associated with earlier discharge (hazard ratio 2.17, 95% CI 1.55–3.04; p < 0.001). ICU admission occurred less frequently in the early surgery group (6.0%) compared with the delayed surgery group (17.7%) (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14–0.83; p = 0.013). No significant differences were observed in VTE, respiratory infection, periprosthetic infection, or one-year mortality between groups. Conclusions: Surgery performed within 48 h of admission was associated with significantly shorter hospital LOS and lower ICU admission rates among elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. These findings highlight the importance of timely surgical intervention to improve perioperative efficiency and hospital resource utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alyami et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Proximal femur fractures (hip fractures) (n=179). Early surgery (<48 hours from admission) vs. Delayed surgery (≥48 hours from admission) was evaluated on Hospital length of stay (LOS) (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.55-3.04, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: