Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study qualitatively explores types of self-dynamics using the Model of the Agonistic Self (MAS), which conceives the self as a field of struggle among inner and social voices. 25 students were selected based on extreme scores on the Dimensions of Identity Development Scale, and 13 completed interviews and cross-case analysis. The Tense Ideological Type exhibits predominance of ideological over evaluative voices and constructive tension supporting adaptive identity development. The Impermeable Type is marked by rigid dominance of few ideological voices and fragile stability. The Conflictual Evaluative Type is characterized by evaluator dominance and escalating inner conflicts, representing maladaptive identity dynamics. Based on these types, a successfully formed identity is defined as relatively stable ideological dominance over evaluators, maintained through selective silencing of certain voices while preserving openness to the dialogue with resistant or emerging voices. Findings highlight the relevance of the MAS for psychological interventions addressing youth identity problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Džinović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: