Key result
A co-designed website for self-directed cardiac rehabilitation increased mean System Usability Scale scores from 66.7 to 73.6 (P=0.26), with significant improvements in ease of use and consistency.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to report on the development and evaluation of a co-designed website for delivering interactive self-directed cardiac rehabilitation.
Does a co-designed website for interactive self-directed cardiac rehabilitation improve usability scores in patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation?
Does a co-designed website for interactive self-directed cardiac rehabilitation improve usability scores in patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 73.6% vs 66.7%
p-value: p=0.26
An iterative co-design process for a self-directed cardiac rehabilitation website resulted in significant improvements in user-reported easiness of use, functional integration, and consistency.
AIMS: The aim of this study is to report on the development and evaluation of the co-designed website for delivering interactive self-directed cardiac rehabilitation (CR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Multi-method user experience design framework was used to co-design the web application and complete usability testing. Participants were recruited based on their eligibility for CR. Thematic analysis collected the participants' design specifications and lived experiences. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was administered at the completion of the website development and the usability testing workshops. This collected the participants' perceptions of the website's effectiveness, efficiency, and their satisfaction. Website development and usability testing workshops included 39 and 35 participants with a mean age of 66.5 (SD 11.7) and 68.6 (SD 11.2), respectively. Both genders were equally represented across both workshops with 19 (48.7%) and 16 (45.7%) women. Workshop themes guided the design process. The mean SUS scores increased from 66.7 (SD 16.8) to 73.6 (21), P = 0.26. Easiness of use (P = 0.03), integration of the website functions (P ≤ 0.001), and consistency (P = 0.038) significantly improved from website development to usability testing. The proportion of participants rating it as excellent increased from 20.5% to 42.9%, P = 0.11. CONCLUSION: The evolution of our CR website development was completed with an improvement in usability. Upcoming evaluation of this intervention will report on its effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nesbitt et al. (2023) studied Cardiac rehabilitation (n=74). Co-designed website for interactive self-directed cardiac rehabilitation vs. Website development phase (baseline) was evaluated on System Usability Scale (SUS) score (p=0.26). A co-designed website for self-directed cardiac rehabilitation increased mean System Usability Scale scores from 66.7 to 73.6 (P=0.26), with significant improvements in ease of use and consistency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: