Key result
Labour and birth with an activated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator resulted in 0 inappropriate shocks or ventricular arrhythmias across 41 childbirths.
Why the study?
Data and guidelines are lacking, leading to frequent deactivation of ICDs during labour to prevent inappropriate shocks, leaving the safety of an activated ICD during labour uncertain.
Is keeping an ICD activated during labour safe and preferred by patients compared to deactivation in pregnant women with ICDs?
Observational (n=26)
Yes
Is keeping an ICD activated during labour safe and preferred by patients compared to deactivation in pregnant women with ICDs?
Keeping an ICD activated during labour appears safe, with no inappropriate therapies observed, and is significantly preferred by patients over deactivation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports activated ICDs during labour in selected patients; leaves open need for larger prospective studies before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Data and guidelines are lacking, so implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are often deactivated during labour to prevent inappropriate shocks. This study aimed to ascertain the safety of an activated ICD during labour. DESIGN: An observational study was performed. SETTING: Dutch hospitals. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: A total of 41 childbirths were included of 26 patients who gave birth between February 2009 and November 2018 after receiving an ICD in our tertiary hospital. Five of these childbirths were attended by the research team between December 2018 and August 2020, during which the ICD remained active. METHODS: Groups were made based on ICD status during labour. Patients who gave birth with an activated ICD at least once were stratified to the activated ICD group. Patients' files were checked and patients received a questionnaire about childbirth perceptions and treatment preferences. The differences in ordinal data resulting from the questionnaire were calculated using a chi-square or Fisher's exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was inappropriate ICD therapy and occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment. RESULTS: During the 41 childbirths, no inappropriate shocks or ventricular arrhythmias occurred during labour. All patients in the activated ICD group (n = 13) preferred this setting, while 8 of the 13 patients in the deactivated ICD group preferred activation (p = 0.002). Reasons included avoiding hemodynamic monitoring, magnet placement, or labour induction to facilitate technician availability. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no evidence that labour and birth in women with an activated ICD are unsafe, as there were no ventricular arrhythmias or inappropriate therapy. In addition, most patients prefer an activated ICD during labour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuijt et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Pregnancy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n=26). Activated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator vs. Deactivated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was evaluated on Inappropriate ICD therapy and occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment. Labour and birth with an activated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator resulted in 0 inappropriate shocks or ventricular arrhythmias across 41 childbirths.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: