Key result
Replacing PT-INR with Fiix-NR monitoring during warfarin management reduced the incidence of thromboembolism from 2.82% to 1.23% per patient-year (P=0.019) without increasing bleeding.
Why the study?
Variability in PT-INR during warfarin management is partly driven by clinically inconsequential factor VII fluctuations, whereas Fiix-NR is only affected by factor II and factor X.
Does Fiix-NR monitoring reduce thromboembolism and major bleeding compared to PT-INR monitoring in patients on maintenance-phase warfarin?
Observational (n=2,667)
No
Does Fiix-NR monitoring reduce thromboembolism and major bleeding compared to PT-INR monitoring in patients on maintenance-phase warfarin?
Effect estimate: 56% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 1.23% vs 2.82%
p-value: p=0.019
Replacing PT-INR with Fiix-NR monitoring for warfarin management stabilizes the anticoagulant effect and significantly reduces thromboembolic events without increasing bleeding risk.
Fiix-NR monitoring may reduce TE without excess MB on warfarin; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
During warfarin management, variability in prothrombin time-based international normalized ratio (PT-INR) is caused, in part, by clinically inconsequential fluctuations in factor VII (FVII). The new factor II and X (Fiix)-prothrombin time (Fiix-PT) and Fiix-normalized ratio (Fiix-NR), unlike PT-INR, are only affected by reduced FII and FX. We assessed the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) and major bleeding (MB) in all 2667 patients on maintenance-phase warfarin managed at our anticoagulation management service during 30 months; 12 months prior to and 18 months after replacing PT-INR monitoring with Fiix-NR monitoring. Months 13 to 18 were predefined as transitional months. Using 2-segmented regression, a breakpoint in the monthly incidence of TE became evident 6 months after test replacement, that was followed by a 56% reduction in incidence (from 2.82% to 1.23% per patient-year; P = .019). Three-segmented regression did not find any significant trend in TE incidence (slope, +0.03) prior to test replacement; however, during months 13 to 18 and 19 to 30, the incidence of TE decreased gradually (slope, -0.12; R2 = 0.20; P = .007). The incidence of MB (2.79% per patient-year) did not differ. Incidence comparison during the 12-month Fiix and PT periods confirmed a statistically significant reduction (55-62%) in TE. Fiix monitoring reduced testing, dose adjustments, and normalized ratio variability and prolonged testing intervals and time in range. We conclude that ignoring FVII during Fiix-NR monitoring in real-world practice stabilizes the anticoagulant effect of warfarin and associates with a major reduction in TEs without increasing bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oskarsdottir et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Maintenance-phase warfarin management (n=2,667). Fiix-normalized ratio (Fiix-NR) monitoring vs. PT-INR monitoring was evaluated on Incidence of thromboembolism (TE) (56% reduction, p=0.019). Replacing PT-INR with Fiix-NR monitoring during warfarin management reduced the incidence of thromboembolism from 2.82% to 1.23% per patient-year (P=0.019) without increasing bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: