Evaluates nutrient-target compliance and food standards in long-term care menus, suggesting improvement needs.
BACKGROUND: Most provinces require long-term care (LTC) home menus to meet nutrient requirements and align with Canada's food guide (CFG-2019). However, compliance remains challenging for dietitians and food service staff due to limited tools and guidance to support implementation in practice. This study evaluated current and simulated LTC menus against nutrient- and food-based standards to identify the characteristics of menus meeting both requirements. METHODS: A database of 1,365 menu items from a four-week LTC menu cycle provided by a major North American foodservice company was used to simulate 10,000 one-day LTC menus. Compliance with LTC-specific nutrient targets and alignment with CFG-2019 were assessed. Menus meeting both standards were further evaluated using the Canadian Food Scoring System (CFSS) and Healthy Eating Food Index (HEFI)-2019. RESULTS: Current LTC menus (n = 28) met most macronutrient and 10 micronutrient targets, with a mean HEFI-2019 score of 45.3/80 (57%), below the desired 75% compliance threshold. Of the 10,000 simulated menus, 28 met all nutrient-based targets and six met both nutrient- and food-based standards. These compliant menus provided an average of 2,857 kcal, 107 g protein, 32 g fibre, and a mean HEFI-2019 score of 61.7/80 (77%). On average, 58% of menu items were classified as "Good & Excellent" according to the CFSS, with approximately 10 serving equivalents of fruits and vegetables, 2.5 of whole grains, and 5 of protein foods. CONCLUSION: Although provincial regulations require LTC menus to comply with both nutrient- and food-based standards, full compliance was not achieved using foods available from a single large provider. Nutrient-compliant menus were characterized by higher energy provision and greater nutrient density, underscoring the need for more healthy options and practical supports, including LTC-specific planning tools, food guide serving benchmarks, and accessible resources to facilitate routine menu planning and regulatory compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middleton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: