More‐than‐verbal methodological approaches to studying eco‐emotions: A critical narrative review

This critical narrative review foregrounds the contribution of more‐than‐verbal methodological approaches in eco‐emotions research. Existing work focused on eco‐emotions emphasises the need for diversification in research methods and approaches, as well as the types of emotions focused on. In a critical review of selected studies, the use of more‐than‐verbal approaches captures the complexity of emotional responses to climate crisis. An analysis of 247 peer‐reviewed studies reveals an emphasis on fear and sadness‐based eco‐emotions, often investigated through survey‐based methods. Less often, emergent, more‐than‐verbal research designs have been used to study eco‐emotions. Through a detailed examination of eight studies employing more‐than‐verbal elements in the research design, we find that such approaches enrich data collection, allowing a wider range of emotional response to surface. These more‐than‐verbal techniques, commonly employed in geographical research, added value for participants through creating opportunities to process, reflect, and move through their emotional responses. Our findings advocate for the inclusion of more‐than‐verbal methodological design to complement existing work and to explore the full emotional landscape of responses to climate crisis. Researchers grounded in geographical disciplines are uniquely positioned to make transformative contributions, offering place‐based, relational, and creative methodologies that capture the complexity of eco‐emotions. Prioritising methodological innovation and inclusivity allows future research to inform more effective and empathetic interventions. This approach aligns with the urgent need to address the psychological impacts of environmental change while promoting resilience and action across diverse communities.