Feasibility study demonstrates automated aorta screening in healthy volunteers, suggesting future applications in vascular imaging.
Ultrasound is safe, portable, and relatively low cost, and robotic ultrasound research is expanding across many diagnostic applications. Within this context, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening remains comparatively unexplored, with few systems reporting end-to-end autonomous scanning and clinician-validated evaluation in volunteers. We present a conditionally autonomous (Level-3) robotic ultrasound system in which the operator defines the region of interest and confirms the target force band, after which the robot performs surface-constrained abdominal sweeps under force control and automatically selects diagnostic frames and estimates aortic diameter without further manual interaction during scanning. The system combines RGB-depth-based patient-to-robot registration, hybrid position–force control with a low-cost force sensor, and a post-acquisition image-analysis pipeline comprising rule-based aorta localisation, a composite image quality assessment (IQA) metric, and a transfer-learned U-Net segmentation baseline. In a feasibility study on ten healthy volunteers spanning BMI 18.6–33 and diverse sex and skin-tone profiles, the robot maintained stable contact within the target force band in all sessions and produced aortic images rated diagnostically acceptable by clinicians in all participants. Automated diameter measurements showed a mean absolute difference of 1.45 mm relative to clinician reference values, with 9/10 cases within 3 mm and all within the 5 mm screening criterion. Volunteer questionnaires indicated high levels of comfort and trust in the system. These results demonstrate the feasibility of operator-supervised, force-aware robotic AAA scanning and highlight the potential of low-cost robotic ultrasound for wider automated vascular imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: