Key result
Tomographic freehand 3D-US diameter measurements strongly correlated with CTA measurements (ρ = 0.90, p < 0.001) in patients after EVAR, though sealing zones were difficult to assess.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a commercially available tomographic freehand 3D-US system for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms after EVAR.
Does tomographic freehand 3D-US provide comparable diameter measurements to CTA for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms after EVAR?
Observational (n=10)
Does tomographic freehand 3D-US provide comparable diameter measurements to CTA for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms after EVAR?
Effect estimate: ρ = 0.90
p-value: p=< .001
Tomographic freehand 3D-US is a feasible and reproducible method for measuring AAA diameters after EVAR, potentially reducing the need for CTA, though it is limited in assessing sealing zones.
Supports 3D-US investigation for post-EVAR diameter surveillance; leaves open prospective validation before any CTA reduction.
Objectives This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a commercially available tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) system for surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after endovascular repair (EVAR). Methods In 10 patients who underwent EVAR, a 3D-US scan was obtained post-operatively in addition to regular computed tomography angiography (CTA). Five independent observers evaluated 12 EVAR surveillance parameters for the 10 scans, resulting in a total of 600 individual observations. Results The diameters of the neck, sac and iliac arteries were evaluable in most of the observations (neck: 80%, AAA sac: 98%, right CIA: 90%, left CIA: 68%). The diameter measurements of the 3D-US strongly correlated with the diameters measured on CTA ( ρ = 0.90, p < .001). The general offset of 3D-US compared to CTA was −4.4 mm and the proportional bias was 3%. For all observers, the diameter measurements were significantly strongly correlated (O1:ρ = 0.85, O2:ρ = 0.88, O3:ρ = 0.93, O4:ρ = 0.96, O5:ρ = 0.86, p < .001 for all). The inter-observer reliability was excellent with an overall concordance correlation coefficient of 0.98. The start of the endograft, the lowest renal artery, the distance between these landmarks, and the proximal and distal sealing zones were evaluable in fewer than half of the observations (42%, 12%, 10%, 32%, 32%, 26%). Conclusion 3D-US after EVAR is feasible. Diameters measured in 3D-US correlate strongly with CTA-based diameters and have a good interrater variability. However, the sealing zones are difficult to assess on 3D-US. This technique could be a useful addition to duplex ultrasound to facilitate offline 3D analysis, increase measurement reproducibility, enable volume measurements, and minimise the use of harmful CTA for surveillance after EVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rijswijk et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair (n=10). Tomographic freehand three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) vs. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was evaluated on Correlation of diameter measurements between 3D-US and CTA (ρ = 0.90, p=< .001). Tomographic freehand 3D-US diameter measurements strongly correlated with CTA measurements (ρ = 0.90, p < 0.001) in patients after EVAR, though sealing zones were difficult to assess.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: