Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 15, 2026ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review

A Benchmark for Analyzing Cloud Storage Layouts

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DSDebopam SanyalHCHongjie ChenATAlexey Tumanov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Benchmark evaluates storage layouts for multimedia retrieval, suggesting efficiency in cloud storage setups.

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the performance of different cloud storage layouts for multimedia data retrieval.
  • Benchmarking three storage layouts: individual objects, tar archives, and Parquet files.
  • Measuring retrieval time, data transferred, and costs across 11 queries on ImageNet.
  • Testing on six different AWS EC2 instance configurations to assess performance variation.
  • L2 (tar archives) offers lower latency than L1 (individual objects) and L3 (Parquet files) for smaller retrievals.
  • L3 performs fastest for very large retrievals but incurs higher data transfer costs across all sizes.
  • Data transfer cost significantly impacts total expenditure, with L3 being much more expensive than L1 or L2.

Cite This Study

Sanyal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a57245a88b21df875480b80https://doi.org/10.1145/3830422.3830430
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share