Key result
Prehabilitation improves preoperative walking distance and VO2peak over standard care in patients awaiting oncological resections.
Why the study?
To investigate the effects of prehabilitation on the perioperative functional capacity of patients awaiting oncological resections.
Does prehabilitation improve functional capacity in adult patients awaiting oncological resections?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,889)
Does prehabilitation improve functional capacity in adult patients awaiting oncological resections?
Prehabilitation, whether unimodal or multimodal, elicits small preoperative improvements in functional capacity for patients awaiting oncological resections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports prehabilitation in preoperative protocols for oncological resections; extends RCT evidence for functional optimization in surgical oncology.
Purpose To investigate the effects of prehabilitation on the perioperative functional capacity of patients awaiting oncological resections. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and within the databases Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, MEDLINE PubMed, and Web of Science. The eligibility criteria were set to include peer-reviewed randomised control trials including only adult (≥ 18 years old) patients undergoing any type of prehabilitation (PREHAB) prior to any type of oncological resection. The studies had to feature at least one control group undergoing standard care (SC) and had to assess functional capacity by means of a 6-min walk distance (6MWD) or peak oxygen uptake (VO 2Peak ) at different stages pre- and post- operatively. Results Twenty-seven randomised controlled trials involving 1994 patients were included. After processing the data, the number of patients was 1889. Studies featured different cancer specialties: lung (11), colorectal (5), urological (4), abdominal (3), esophagogastric (2), liver (1), and gastrointestinal (1). Overall, PREHAB enhanced both 6MWD ( g = 0.273, 95% CI 0.174 to 0.371, Z = 5.406, p < 0.001) and VO 2Peak ( g = 0.615, 95% CI 0.243 to 0.987, Z = 3.240, p = 0.001) compared with SC. The 6MWD subgroup analysis revealed a small mean effect size favouring both unimodal and multimodal PREHAB interventions. Conclusion These findings support that prehabilitation, whether implemented as unimodal or multimodal format, elicits small preoperative improvements in functional capacity in patients awaiting oncological resections. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023428676.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laza‐Cagigas et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer awaiting oncological resection (n=1,889). Prehabilitation vs. Standard care was evaluated on Preoperative 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (g = 0.273, 95% CI 0.174 to 0.371, p=<0.001). Prehabilitation improved preoperative functional capacity, enhancing walking distance and exercise capacity compared to standard care in patients awaiting oncological resections.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: