Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates lumbar spine MRI dataset utility for improving automated analysis and clinical insights.
Automated analysis of lumbar spine MRI remains constrained by the absence of a comprehensive dataset integrating pixel-level anatomy, quantitative markings, and radiological reports within a unified framework. We present LSMA-PQR, a clinically validated lumbar spine MRI dataset comprising $$N = 515$$ N = 515 patients with dual-plane, dual-sequence imaging (axial and sagittal T1/T2-weighted; 4120 images) and comprehensive multi-modal annotations. Pixel-level segmentation masks for seven anatomical structures are provided in multiple interoperable formats with verified cross-format spatial consistency (mean IoU = 0.994 ± 0.008 = 0.994 ± 0.008 ). Beyond anatomy, the dataset integrates quantitative disc markings including 1545 Pfirrmann degeneration grades (L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1) and intervertebral disc height measurements with pixel-coordinate provenance, as well as structured radiological reports derived from 515 free-text documents through systematic natural language processing that identified and corrected 340 transcription errors across 59% of reports. Clinical validation of the dataset reveals peak degeneration at L5-S1 (71%), a 40% prevalence of severe pathology (Pfirrmann Grade 4–5), and a moderate-to-strong correlation between clinical severity and expert-assigned grades. Baseline experiments on three downstream tasks, multi-plane segmentation (mean Dice = 0.946), disc-aware Pfirrmann grading (quadratic weighted κ κ = 0.51), and structured clinical findings extraction (weighted F1 = 0.59), demonstrate the dataset’s utility for training and evaluating automated lumbar spine analysis systems. LSMA-PQR, available at Mendeley Data , enables previously infeasible research including report-guided supervision, multi-metric cross-validation and integrated modeling of lumbar spine anatomy, degeneration and clinical findings. Data and documentation are released under a CC BY 4.0 license to accelerate translational spine imaging research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masood et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: