Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic examination of belongingness literature reveals a unified framework, suggesting implications for interventions.
Belongingness is a universal human need, with strong links to mental health and wellbeing. It is an essential element of theoretical perspectives across clinical, social, organisational and educational domains. In the early 1990s, belongingness was rigorously described and operationalised leading to considerable ongoing research. Nevertheless, while overlapping substantially, theoretical conceptualisations to date have not coalesced into a unified understanding. This study systematically examined existing literature on belongingness published between 1992 and 2022 to produce a unified definition and integrated conceptual framework. Essential characteristics of belongingness were mapped, yielding a two-by-two conceptualisation: (1) a cognitive vs. behavioural continuum; (2) a membership vs. relational value continuum. This integration of previous literature may facilitate a more precise measurement model, mapping of belongingness research onto a unified framework, and advances in belongingness-based interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: