Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates treatment strategies for culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection, indicating potential for favorable outcomes.
Introduction: Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN-PJI) remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge because antimicrobial and surgical management are often empirical. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate treatment strategies and outcomes of CN-PJI. MEDLINE and Scopus were searched through 3 July 2025, and 27 cohort studies including 1399 CN-PJI patients were included. Results: Random-effect meta-analyses showed a pooled treatment success proportion of 83.6 % (95 % CI, 78.2–87.9), a pooled failure proportion of 17.2 % (95 % CI, 12.6–22.9), and a pooled mortality proportion of 2.4 % (95 % CI, 1.3–4.6). Subgroup analyses demonstrated lower success and higher failure with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention compared with one-stage and two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Hip CN-PJI showed higher reported success than knee CN-PJI. Antimicrobial regimens were highly heterogeneous and were not suitable for pooled analysis. Conclusion: Overall, CN-PJI may have favorable outcomes, particularly with exchange arthroplasty, but prospective studies with standardized definitions and treatment reporting are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pourghazi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: