Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposed governance architecture enhances AI safety through relational constants, suggesting new pathways for development.
Current approaches to AI safety often treat governance as restriction: externally imposed rules that constrain model behavior through refusal, filtering, and post hoc intervention. This paper proposes an alternative architecture: governance grounded in three relational constants—Reciprocity, Embodiment, and Non-Domination—arranged in a dependency topology in which Reciprocity functions as the generative substrate, Embodiment as a constraint layer acting on it, and Non-Domination as a governance condition acting on that foundation. Emergence is modeled as the dependent output produced when these conditions function coherently, rather than as a fourth constant scored in parallel. These principles are operationalized through the Syzygy Rosetta framework, a pre-guard governance middleware layer that evaluates interactions, rewrites responses where appropriate, and escalates high-risk cases before model outputs reach users. The framework encodes twelve invariants with dual machine- and human-readable specifications. This paper presents eight weeks of build documentation and adversarial testing across three scenarios: jailbreak interception, financial-violation rewriting, and a documented healthcare detection failure. Together, the implementation and evaluation provide a transparent account of the framework’s current capabilities, limitations, and future development path, including a planned second-stage semantic evaluation layer to address documented detection gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarasha Elion (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: