Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus has begun to emerge around the potential effectiveness of multi-level, mental health interventions within sport. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of existing multi-level interventions aimed at enhancing mental health and wellbeing and/or reducing mental ill-health (depression, anxiety, eating disorders, gambling and alcohol use) within sport and identify key characteristics of effective multi-level interventions. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023385320). We systematically searched PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed up to August 2025. This search yielded 19 studies evaluating 12 different multi-level interventions. We examined methodological quality through the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and used a narrative synthesis. We provide evidence for the effectiveness of multi-level interventions in enhancing individuals’ mental health and/or reducing mental ill-health within amateur and collegiate level sport. Key characteristics of effective multi-level interventions included: engagement with key stakeholders and/or significant others, involvement of multiple sessions/points of contact and inclusion of multiple, targeted components. Methodological quality across the studies was mixed with evaluations lacking long term follow-up data and process evaluations and a paucity of interventions targeting the elite sport context, female participants, and/or gambling outcomes. This review was funded by the Economic Social Research Council.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogden et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: