Key result
Quadruple HFrEF therapy adds quality-adjusted life years over SGLT2i alone at ~$98,500 per QALY.
Why the study?
The 2022 clinical guidelines for HFrEF management recommend quadruple therapy with ARNi and SGLT2i additions, but the cost-effectiveness of this regimen remained to be evaluated.
Is quadruple therapy cost-effective compared to previous standard of care in US patients with HFrEF?
Is quadruple therapy cost-effective compared to previous standard of care in US patients with HFrEF?
Quadruple therapy for HFrEF offers intermediate value and is borderline cost-effective in the US, with its value highly sensitive to negotiated drug prices for ARNIs and SGLT2is.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support quadruple therapy consideration in HFrEF if cost-effective; leaves open prospective validation of real-world implementation.
BACKGROUND: The 2022 clinical guidelines for management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction call for quadruple therapy. Quadruple therapy consists of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and beta blocker. The ARNi and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor are newer additions to standard of care with the ARNi replacing ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. METHODS: We investigate the cost-effectiveness of sequentially adding the SGLT2i and ARNi to form quadruple therapy as compared with the previous standard of care with ACE inhibitor/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist/beta blocker. Using a 2-stage Markov model, we projected the expected lifetime discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of a simulated cohort of US patients who underwent each treatment option and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We assessed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using criteria for health care value (<$50 000/quality-adjusted life year [QALY] indicating high-value, $50 000-150 000/QALY indicating intermediate value, and >$150 000/QALY indicating low-value) and a standard $100 000/QALY cost-effectiveness threshold. RESULTS: Compared with the previous standard of care, the SGLT2i addition had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $73 000/QALY and weakly dominated the ARNi addition. The addition of both the ARNi and SGLT2i for quadruple therapy offered 0.68 additional discounted QALYs over the SGLT2i addition alone at a lifetime discounted cost of $66 700, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98 500/QALY. In sensitivity analysis varying drug prices, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for quadruple therapy ranged from $73 500/QALY using prices available to the US Department of Veterans Affairs to $110 000/QALY using drug list prices. CONCLUSIONS: While quadruple therapy offers intermediate value, it is borderline cost effective compared with adding the SGLT2i alone to previous standard of care. Thus, its cost-effectiveness is sensitive to a payer's ability to negotiate discounts off the increasing list prices for ARNI and SGLT2is. The demonstrated benefits of ARNi and SGLT2is should be weighed against their high prices in payer and policy considerations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2023) studied Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Quadruple therapy (ARNi, SGLT2i, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and beta blocker) vs. Previous standard of care (ACE inhibitor/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist/beta blocker) and SGLT2i addition alone was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER $98,500/QALY). Quadruple therapy for HFrEF yielded 0.68 additional QALYs over SGLT2i addition alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98,500/QALY.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: