Key result
Cone reconstruction for Ebstein's anomaly led to acute post-operative reductions in biventricular function, including TAPSE (26.42 vs 8.75 mm, P<0.001) and RV FAC (45.0% vs 35.5%, P=0.038).
Why the study?
Does Cone reconstruction surgery alter biventricular echocardiographic function in symptomatic patients with Ebstein's anomaly and severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=17)
Does Cone reconstruction surgery alter biventricular echocardiographic function in symptomatic patients with Ebstein's anomaly and severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cone reconstruction for Ebstein's anomaly results in an acute post-operative reduction in biventricular myocardial function, with a trend toward later recovery for the left ventricle.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RV function gains post-Cone reconstruction may inform EA expectations; hypothesis-generating and leaves open prospective validation.
Aims: The Cone reconstruction in Ebstein's anomaly (EA) aims to reduce tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) and reposition the valve to the anatomic annulus, but post-operative progress of ventricular function is poorly understood. This study evaluated biventricular function after Cone reconstruction using echocardiographic techniques. Methods and results: A retrospective study assessing longitudinal change was conducted from 2009 to 2014. All symptomatic patients with EA and severe TR undergoing surgery were included. Transthoracic advanced echocardiography was performed pre- and post-operatively (at short-term (<30 days) and mid-term). Conventional and longitudinal 2D strain parameters were measured for left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV). Paired analyses were compared using Wilcoxon Matched-pairs signed rank test. From the 38 patients operated for EA, the echocardiographic data of 17 patients, aged 15 (1-57 years) at operation could be analysed. Median follow up was 6 months (8 days-54 months). The tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (26.42 ± 5.79 mm vs. 8.75 ± 3.18 mm, P < 0.001), RV fractional area change (FAC) (45.00 ± 8.13% vs. 35.46 ± 5.76%, P = 0.038) and LV 2D peak systolic strain were significantly reduced post-operatively (-20.49 ± 2.79 vs. -17.73 ± 2.76, P = 0.041), with a trend to later recovery for LV 2D strain. There was no evidence of systolic mechanical dys-synchrony before or after operation. Conclusion: Although clinical outcome of Cone reconstruction for EA remains excellent, acute post-operative changes leads to reduction of myocardial function of both ventricles, with a trend to later recovery for LV. Continuing impairment of RV function is multifactorial but may reflect intrinsic myocardial deficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perdreau et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Ebstein's anomaly (n=17). Cone reconstruction vs. Pre-operative baseline was evaluated on Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p=<0.001). Cone reconstruction for Ebstein's anomaly led to acute post-operative reductions in biventricular function, including TAPSE (26.42 vs 8.75 mm, P<0.001) and RV FAC (45.0% vs 35.5%, P=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: