Key result
Cone repair in patients with Ebstein anomaly decreased right ventricular end-diastolic volume index from 166 ml/m2 to 114 ml/m2 and improved functional class.
Why the study?
The effect of the Cone repair on exercise performance and right ventricular remodeling in patients with Ebstein anomaly was unclear.
Does the Cone repair improve exercise performance and right ventricular remodeling in patients with Ebstein anomaly?
Cohort (n=46)
No
Does the Cone repair improve exercise performance and right ventricular remodeling in patients with Ebstein anomaly?
The Cone repair for Ebstein anomaly significantly improves right ventricular remodeling and NYHA class, although objective exercise capacity may only improve in severely symptomatic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cone repair for RV remodeling and symptoms in Ebstein anomaly; leaves open exercise capacity effects pending prospective trials.
BACKGROUND While the Cone repair has shown good outcome regarding valve competence, its effect on exercise performance and right ventricular remodelling are unclear. METHODS Between 01/2010 and 06/2021, 60 patients underwent a Cone repair at our centre. We excluded patients with previous operation (n=6), age<5 years (n=3), in-hospital-death (n=2), replacement before discharge (n=1) and missing follow-up (n=2), resulting in a study-population of 46 patients. Median age was 27 years [range: 5.6-68.2], 28 (61%) were female. Patients were divided based on indication: (A) patients in NYHA I-II without findings of severe/progressed disease (B), patients in NYHA I-II and findings of severe/progressed disease in MRI or Spiroergometry, and (C) patients in NYHA III-IV. RESULTS Follow-up was 6.7±3.7years. Tricuspid regurgitation at last follow-up was none-mild in 40 patients, moderate in five, and severe in one patient, who underwent reoperation after 5.7years. NYHA class improved in 18 patients, stayed equal in 24 and worsened in four (p=0.002). CPET showed no difference between preoperative and postoperative exercise-capacity (preoperative: 72% of predicted vs. postoperative: 71%, p=1.0). Exercise-capacity improved only in group C. RV-EDVI decreased from 166ml/m2 to 114ml/m2 (p<0.001), the reduction was smaller in group A (-13%) compared to group B and C (-23% and -53%). Antegrade stroke-volume increased in every group (preoperative: 55ml, postoperative: 72ml, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS The Cone repair results in a substantial and sustained decrease in tricuspid valve regurgitation. While objective exercise capacity did not improve, NYHA class improvement, right ventricle size decreased and antegrade stroke volume increased.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burri et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Ebstein Anomaly (n=46). Cone repair vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RV-EDVI) (p=<0.001). Cone repair in patients with Ebstein anomaly decreased right ventricular end-diastolic volume index from 166 ml/m2 to 114 ml/m2 and improved functional class.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: