Review synthesizes evidence on AI literacy among pre-service teachers, highlighting implementation needs for teacher education programs.
The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies — including generative tools, intelligent tutoring systems, and adaptive learning platforms — is reshaping the teacher–student relationship into a teacher–AI–student dynamic (UNESCO, 2024). Despite this shift, teacher education programmes have been slow to embed AI literacy as a core professional competency, leaving pre-service teachers to enter classrooms with fragmented and largely self-acquired understanding of AI. Purpose: This review synthesises conceptualisations and empirical evidence on AI literacy among pre-service teachers and positions it as an emerging, distinct dimension of teacher professional development. Review methodology: Following a systematic narrative-review protocol, fifteen peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Frontiers, and Elsevier/Springer databases and analysed thematically alongside foundational policy documents (UNESCO, NEP 2020). Major findings: Pre-service teachers generally demonstrate moderate AI awareness and ethical sensitivity but weaker pedagogical-integration and problem-solving competencies; structured, TPACK-aligned coursework produces measurable gains, though most evidence remains cross-sectional and geographically concentrated. Practical implications: Teacher-education institutions, particularly those regulated by India's National Council for Teacher Education, require embedded — rather than elective — AI-literacy modules, faculty capacity-building, and revised practicum assessment. Conclusion: AI literacy should be formally recognised as a fourth pillar of teacher professional development alongside content, pedagogical, and technological knowledge, warranting coordinated policy, curricular, and institutional action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asshar Ahmad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: