Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study assesses survival outcomes in children with ALL, indicating variations by risk group.
Outcomes of children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated using an institutional risk-adapted strategy were assessed, and survival was compared among risk groups. Materials and Methods Thisretrospective study included patients newly diagnosed with ALL during 2006-2020.Patients were stratified as standard-risk (SR), high-risk (HR), or very-high-risk (VHR).The SR group received a POG 9605-based protocol in 2006-2011 and a modified regimen with an additional delayed intensification phase in 2012-2020.The HR group received the ALL 0601 regimen, and the VHR group received institutional hematopoietic stem cell transplantationoriented treatment. ResultsNinety-two patients were included (SR, 34; HR, 45; and VHR,13).The 10-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 85.2% and 70.9%, with cumulative incidences of relapse and treatment-related mortality of 22.6% and 3.3%, respectively.The 10-year OS was 92.8%, 88.7%, and 60.9% in the SR, HR, and VHR groups, and the corresponding 10-year EFS was 78.5%, 77.2%, and 34.2%, respectively.In SR, 10-year OS/EFS were 85.1%/71.4% in 2006-2011 and 100%/84.4% in 2012-2020.In the HR group, rapid early responders exhibited significantly better outcomes than did slow early responders, with 10-year OS of 97.0% vs. 63.6%(p = 0.001) and 10-year EFS of 87.9% vs. 43.6%(p < 0.001).Most relapses occurred during therapy or within 3 years of treatment completion. ConclusionVHR patients and HR patients with slow early response demonstrated the poorest outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: