Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates the Conspiracy Practice Scale for measuring conspiracy beliefs, suggesting it is reliable and valid across cultures.
Conspiracy theories have recently been met with a lot of public scrutiny. They are generally addressed as a form of belief system that is underpinned by psychological dispositions. In contrast, we introduce the Conspiracy Practice Scale (CPS-6) as a novel instrument focussing on the spread and consumption of conspiracy theories as a form of social practice. In a random split of a dataset collected in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland (N = 6,460), exploratory factor analysis was employed to determine dimensionality of the CPS-6 and discriminate it against conspiracy mentality (nEFA = 3,229). CPS-6 emerged as distinct single dimension with good overall reliability (α = .86, ω = .87). Results were confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the second split (nCFA = 3,231). Multi-group CFA revealed measurement invariance across countries and convergent validity was indicated by correlations with related constructs. Overall, results show CPS-6 to be a reliable and valid short-scale to measure conspiracy practice as a distinct construct.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knasmüller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: